| |
PRIVATISATION
SOLIDARITY
Representing
the JCTR, I stand here this morning in solidarity with concerned citizens of
Zambia in addressing the serious issues raised by the government's decision to
privatise some remaining para-statal organisations.
The
JCTR studies and advocates for social justice in Zambia on such critical issues
as living conditions (the monthly Basic Need Basket), debt cancellation (Jubilee
Zambia campaign), poverty policies (Civil Society for Poverty Reduction), and
religious promotion of justice (Church's Social Teaching.)
In
all of this, our aim is a people -centered, integral and sustainable
development. Our position is clear: the economy is for the people; people
are not for the economy. Any economic policy must be evaluated primarily
with one central criteria: what is the impact on the people, especially on
the poor?
Therefore
we view with concern the privatization process compelled by the Structural
Adjustment Programme (SAP). Any honest evaluation of the past ten years of
privatization will acknowledge that overall it has done great
damage to the Zambian people's livelihood: loss off jobs, closure of businesses,
foreign dominance of assets, increase in poverty levels, etc.
The
para-statal in question at the moment-ZESCO, ZANACO and ZAMTEL-face
serious economical and management problems largely caused by the inefficient and
frequently corrupts use of their resources by government and the ruling party.
It is understandable that a cry comes from some circles-especially international
financial institutions and creditor nations-for privatization. With most
Zambians we believe that that some immediate and serious action must be taken to
guarantee that electricity is delivered, that people's money is safe and that
communications work. But we believe that any such actions should only
be taken after:
- Serious
evaluation of previous privatization experience in Zambia is carried out in
order to learn both positive and negative lessons from accountable and
transparent reports of what has occurred to date
- Full
and open process of negotiations are conducted with public monitoring of the
processes by civil society
- Complete
explorations of various options are made to determine the most efficient and
most equitable procedure to follow, e.g., concessions, management
arrangements, etc.
- Thorough
employment impact studies are made to look at numbers of people affected,
wages, retrenchments, severance packages, etc.
- Explicit
integration of any actions taken into the priorities of the Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper, which is the mandated development guide for all
government and public economic action.
- Clear
de-linking of this process from Zambia's qualification for HIPC, so that the
debt relief process is not held ransom to foreign manipulations.
Until
such steps are in place to the satisfaction of all stakeholders-especially the
poor of Zambia -no action should be taken.
February
2003
|