Wednesday, February 09, 2005
The
JCTR Reflections at the 5th World Social Forum (WSF)
Background and Introduction
What is the WSF?
The
month of January has in the last five years come to be associated
with an important event on the international calendar of civil
society organisations: the World Social Forum (WSF). The WSF is
basically an open space for the democratic debate and exchange of
ideas about social and economic policies developed throughout the
world. Its main objective is the exchange of experiences and the
creation of propositions for the construction of a human centred
society, which promotes justice, peace, and equality for all. The
WSF evolved as a direct response to another important event called
the World Economic Forum (WEF) whose meetings are usually held in
the Swiss town of Davos.
The fifth edition of the WSF was held from January 26th
to the
31st January 2005
in the Brazilian
City
of Porto
Alegre.
Brazil
has hosted the event for the fourth time, with the other event
having taken place in the Indian
City
of Mumbai in 2004. This makes Porto Alegre
City
a world reference centre on social and policy debates.
The
recent WSF was the fifth event since its inception in 2001 while the
WEF was the thirty-fourth gathering. These are unique meetings in
their own right as they have similar agendas but motivated by
different set of values. The WSF is driven by social concerns of
development anchored in human needs while the WEF is largely pushed
by economic and business concerns with pockets of reference to
poverty issues as by-the-way issues. Jubilee-Zambia Policy Analyst
representing the Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection (JCTR) was
recently in Brazil
for the WSF where he participated in the meetings and now brings us
the following report:
WSF-For
Who and Why?
The
Porto Alegre forum going by the theme:
“Another World Is Possible” brought together over 100,000
civil activists from the Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs),
trade unions, academics, human rights activists, environmentalists,
women’s and children’s movements, among many others to try to
craft a world centred on human development rather than the abstract
rule of market forces! During
the six days of the deliberations, over 2000 seminars and workshops
had been held looking at a wide range of issues including Third
world crippling external debts with a high focus on Africa’s
immense debts, debt relief for the Tsunami hit countries, the Iraq
war and global militarisation, gender and women empowerment,
HIV/AIDS and the generic drugs, peace and democracy, trade and
commerce, social and economic rights, and resistance against
religious fundamentalism.
Solidarity in People’s Power and Voice
There
is something to be said about the strength of the WSF and that power
lies in its strong mobilisation against a unified force of
neo-liberalism that has been unleashed on the poor countries. The
fact that tens of thousands of civil activists meet every year to
resist and oppose current global economic policy shows that
something is fundamentally wrong somewhere! It is therefore suicidal
for world leaders, international financial institutions (IFIs), the
World Trade Organisation (WTO), Multinational Corporations (MNCs)
and others to simply ignore such gatherings as mere noise! The WSF
strongly opposes the neo-liberal model of economic development and
contends that there must be a new orientation to economics in order
to address social and economic human rights. As one Jesuit candidly
observed “the current economic model must be changed to build
economies of solidarity. These efforts must aim at putting wealth at
the service of human beings, refusing to allow the world to become a
commodity for sale”.
WSF and Neo-Liberalism
The
Forum rejects neo-liberalism and those globalisation policies that
literally make millions of people across the globe as mere tools of
production while massive profits are reaped off their labour and
enjoyed by a few international capitalists. Why for instance, should
a capitalist in another continent enjoy the toil of a poor mother or
rural farmer in Africa?
Why are there global imbalances in trade that make one part of the
world richer while the other gets impoverished? Why should basic
needs of life such as education and health-care be determined
through an imperfect market system in a world characterised by large
numbers of economically disempowered people? Can an imperfect market
system address issues of equity adequately?
These and many other hard questions have consistently been
raised by the WSF in the last few years and they need urgent
answers. For instance, during the just ended World Economic Forum in
Davos, British Prime Minister Tony Blair bluntly stated, “Africa’s
poverty is a scar on the conscience of the developed world”. What
does he mean? Is he not indirectly admitting that the developed
world’s policy interventions have failed to move Africa
out of the doldrums of debt and poverty? Shouldn’t then the
leaders in the West listen to the voices of the poor coming from the
WSF?
WSF’s
Position on External Debt and HIV/AIDS
There
was a strong recognition that the external debts had continued to
frustrate efforts aimed at fighting the HIV/AIDS pandemic in many
poor countries. These debts must be cancelled as a matter of urgency
to release resources required for a sustained campaign against the
pandemic that has left a trail of human suffering with an ever
increasing army of orphans! A horde of anti debt campaigners and
academicians from Latin America, Europe
and Africa
joined hands in criticising half-hearted responses from the creditor
institutions in dealing with the debt crisis across the World.
Southern
governments were particularly urged to heighten their call for total
debt cancellation if their economies are to make sense and remain
relevant in this 21st century. Poor countries were also
called upon to prioritise their national budgets with a clear focus
on the provision of basic social services, clean and safer water for
their populations and not squander meagre resources through debt
service payments on debts that had already been paid several times
over! As one activist Ana Maria R. Nemenzo from the Philippines,
President of the Freedom from Debt Coalition puts it,
“Southern governments, under duress had been cooperative with
creditors, sacrificing their respective people just to meet the
payments of these debts. The practice must be stopped to give these
countries a fighting chance to develop”. How else can one put it
other than to say that external debts are “decimating” lives by
destabilising national budgets through needless resource diversion!
The
Forum also saw the launch of the Global Campaign Against Poverty
that was witnessed by the President of Brazil Silva De Lula and he
became the first world leader to support this initiative. Lula
stressed, “Peace is only possible if we end poverty. The
transformation we see in Brazil
and other parts of Latin
America
did not come over night. It is a mark of resistance and
perserverance. We have to take small steps to get where we need. But
we will get there!” And sitting next to President Lula was Wahu
Kaara a long time civil activist of the African Ecumenical
Council from Kenya who in her own words was ‘disgusted at the
powerful people who choose to remain as spectators as young girls
are forced into prostitution and children continue to die from
treatable diseases like malnutrition’. She said that the current
strategies on poverty reduction were ineffective and hence needed to
be reviewed.
WSF Puts Globalisation On the Chopping Board!
It
is important to underscore one point here lest the disciples of
globalisation misunderstand us. The Porto
Alegre
meetings do not reject globalisation per se, however, they question
the type of globalisation being pursued at the moment. Surely no one
in his/her right frame of mind would oppose the current advancements
in human medicines through sound scientific research that have
brought relief to millions of sick people or the high techs in
computers, laptops, internet, DVDs, VCDs, etc that have literally
made the world a better place to live in. Imagine a modern world
without planes or cell phones! These are the positive elements of
globalisation that need to be galvanised and made available to many
of our people for a decent living. However, what is being opposed
within the globalisation process is the deliberate move that deifies
profits at the expense of human needs. The current process is
evidently faulty as can be seen by the rising numbers of economic
casualties in form of the poor people that it has created in its
trail of destruction! Certainly there are a lot of factors that
cause poverty in the poor South and key among them is the
inappropriate economic frameworks literally imposed on it by
external forces.
Like
I mentioned in a similar article in 2004, most world leaders
continue to reaffirm their commitment to eradicating poverty within
the context of corporate globalisation and neo-liberalism. However,
the stark reality and empirical evidence on the ground clearly show
that the fight against poverty is not being won under these
conditions. It is clear that most poor countries particularly in the
global South will not be able to attain the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) by 2015 unless something drastic is done to reverse the
poor trends in development policy.
Poverty
eradication cannot be achieved in boardrooms or seminars using the
state-of-the-art power point presentations! It has to be done
outside those beautiful air-conditioned offices! And that is
precisely the message from the WSF to the world leaders.
Another
World is Possible! Let’s Build It!
People’s
movements across the world are now working to demonstrate that the
path to sustainable development and social and economic justice does
not lie in neo-liberal globalisation but in alternative models for
people-centred and self-reliant progress. Since 2001, the World
Social Forum process is questioning the rules of global investments
and governance dictated by the World Economic Forum. It proposes
democratic, people-centred alternatives to imperialist
globalisation. The WSF is a response of the growing international
movement that is challenging capitalist-led globalisation and the
neo-liberal economic policies pursued by most countries. Firmly
committed to the belief that Another World Is Possible, the
WSF is an open space for discussing alternatives to the dominant
neo-liberal processes, for exchanging experiences and for
strengthening alliances among organisations, people’s movements
and civil society organisations.
Indeed Another World Is Possible as observed by the JCTR in their statement released at the 2005 WSF if
indigenous policies and the local people drive the development
process. It is possible if there are equitable trade relations
between the North and the South and if there is a genuine
willingness by developed countries to institute democracy in the
manner and way global structures such as the WTO, IMF and the World
Bank are governed. Certainly another world is possible if all Third World debts including those of Zambia
are cancelled in full and harmful economic conditionalities are
dropped from the developed agenda.
Conclusion
In
conclusion I want to assert that the WSF should be seen as an
excellent platform that helps world leaders to remain accountable
for their actions and evaluate their contributions to the overall
global development process. From the proceedings of the Forum it is
clear that peoples’ movements are building alliances not only with
each other but also with partners who are willing to work with them
to bring back human dignity. The stage for social and economic
transformation has been set: can anyone ignore it and at what cost?
By
Jack Jones Zulu (Jubilee-Zambia Policy Analyst) |