A society's world view derivesfrom various factors and informs both perspectives and actions. Rev. Damian Musonda, rector of the major seminary in Zambia, presents the African world view, and Alex Muyebe, S.J., former JCTR staff member, explores the identity issue. Zampi Phiri, S.J., looks at the traditional practice of bride price, reflecting from his pastoral experience.
UNDERSTANDING THE AFRICAN WORLD VIEW
This presentation is meant to set the background for a discussion of healing in the African context. It will provide the outline of some main elements that form the African world view. The world view provides the people with concepts about the world, who they are, and what they have to do in order to realise what they consider to be their destiny. It also provides tools for responding to the situations of crisis. It is the starting point of thinking, conduct, and emotional reaction. Since the world view belongs to the deepest level of culture, it is important to say something about the levels of culture in order to understand it. This presentation will begin with the discussion of the levels of culture, the world view in general, and afterwards discuss the African world view.
THE LEVELS OF CULTURE
There are three levels of culture on which society organises itself. The first and surface consists of the signs and symbols minus their meaning. These signs and symbols are the building blocks of a culture. Anybody, even those who are not members of the culture, can recognise the elements that form this first level of a culture.
The second level is that of function or meanings. The society relates various signs and symbols to one another through function to create a system of meanings. This is not evident to the stranger, and needs time to discover the various meanings attached to various signs and symbols or a cluster of signs and symbols.
The most important and deepest level of a culture is the mentality. This is the basic psychology, the underlying ways of a society, the starting points of thinking, reacting, and motivating, the fundamental premises, attitudes, and drives. This third and deepest level of culture determines the first two levels of forms or symbols and of function. In order to move beyond the level of symbols and experience the realities they symbolise, one has to move to the third level of culture. By investigating the third level of culture one is faced with the fundamental conceptions and values.
THE WORLD VIEW IN GENERAL
A major and most important element that shapes the third level of culture is the world view. The world view is the central systematisation of conception, of reality to which members of the culture assent (largely unconsciously) and from which stems their value system. The world view answers such basic questions as: who and what am I? Why am I in the world? What is reality? Is the present life the only possible way to live? What is the meaning of death? What is the origin of the world and its purpose? What is the proper orientation to time and space? The answers to these and similar questions give a distinctive character to a culture.
The world view has five functions to perform for the members of a culture. The first function deals with the explanation of reality. In this function it tells the society what and how it is to think about the world and life in general. For example, the concepts of witches, sorcerers, taboos, totem, and so on, are part of the African world view which provide the African with a satisfactory explanation of otherwise enigmatic happenings in the world, such as sudden deaths through a tragic accident or an unexpected coming upon a fortune. Myths, apart from being a means of communicating moral values, also give explanations of reality.
The second function of the world view is evaluation. This judges all important and valued behaviour in the economic, political, social, religious and educational fields in terms of the people's assumptions, beliefs, values, meanings and sanctions.
The third function is psychological re-enforcement. When anxieties and crises in life happen, it is to one's conceptual system that one turns for the encouragement to continue or to be stimulated to take other actions. This is the case during such times as illness, birth, death, and transition times such as puberty and marriage.
Very often the psychological re-enforcement takes a form of a ritual or ceremony communally celebrated to render support to an individual and a group. This psychological re-enforcement is perhaps the function that vividly points to the existence of the African world view in the present situation. In times of crises many people, even the educated, turn to traditional practices such as consulting diviners and traditional doctors.
The fourth function of the world view is integration. The world view systematises and orders for the particular people their perceptions of reality into an overall design. This design helps them to interpret multifarious events to which they are exposed. In the process it filters out most of those elements that do not conform to the beliefs that explain what reality is.
The fifth and last function of the world view is adaptation. This especially works in times of cultural change. The world view reconciles irreconcilable differences between old and new understandings. new ideas are integrated into the old system of understanding reality and life. Thus, whatever is novel in any society is at least partly traceable to elements in the world view that has developed over time.
A society will hesitate or refuse to adopt any new idea that it senses to be inconsistent with its cultural system or for which it feels no need. If, on the other hand, the new idea appears at least in some respect desirable, the society will begin to re-interpret it so that it does fit into own world view.
AFRICAN WORLD VIEWS
There are many variations, interpretations and institutionalisation of beliefs and customs among the peoples of sub-Saharan Africa. This poses a difficulty of precisely delineating the fundamental elements of the African world view or even better African world views. My task here is not to give a full account of these various elements in the different African cultures, but rather to give a synthesis of major elements that can be found more or less in any African culture.
INTEGRATION
The first element in the African world view is the philosophy of integration. God, humanity and nature are ontological categories which are inextricably related, even though they are conceptually distinct. Animals, plants and inanimate things are an integral part of nature, deserving as much attention and respect as human beings. The basis of this unity is God himself who communicates his life to all creatures in the act of creation.
This is why in the African world view there is no dichotomy between the secular and the sacred. All reality is sacred. In this connection the fundamental concern of the Africans is to maintain unity. Thus Africans seek to maintain the relationships in nature, among the people themselves, and with God.
That is why the healing process does not only target the body only, but even more importantly, it is also aimed at bringing about social harmony. During my research I came across a case of a person who had quarreled with his mother over the marriage payment for his daughter which he allegedly did not share with other relatives as per custom. I was told that due to the broken relationship between the two, his goats started to die one after the other.
Then somebody stole his nets. Within a short time he became ill. So the elders had to intervene. They went to the diviner who told them the cause of his illness. They were told that the mother was responsible for all the calamities the man was experiencing because she was annoyed at his behaviour. If he wanted to be cured he had to go and apologise to his mother and let them share a meal as a sign of reconciliation.
Sharing a meal is a sign of communicating goodwill and life. In order to ensure unity, the will of the ancestors, embodied in customary law and traditions coming from the ancestors, has to be followed. Following them is a sure sign of maintaining unity and life. In this connection the role of leaders is crucial.
On the ethnic level the chiefs are symbols of unity for the people in their area. They are a link to the past and ensure that the life of their people is protected and enhanced by the people's adherence to the traditions of their ancestors. On the level of the clan, the elders play a very prominent role in ensuring unity of the clan and protection of life.
The clan is the level where the communion of life is thought to be strong since all the members of the same clan share the same ancestral blood. So following the advice of the elders is crucial for maintenance and enhancement of the common life of the clan. To disobey them is to put life at risk. Elders, through their experience and their nearness to the departed in the hierarchy of being, are better placed to interpret the will of the ancestors. For this reason they are to be obeyed.
HIERARCHY OF THINGS AND PEOPLE
The second element in the African world view is the hierarchy of created reality and people. The African people believe that although all created reality and people share the same life there is variety and degree of participation in it. God is the fullness of life, from whom all other beings get their life. Below God are divinities and spirits (natural or ancestral and of the spirits of the deceased) who are also the creation of God. Then follow the living people. Below them are the animals and birds, followed by trees and grass.
Finally, at the bottom level, are the non-mobile things such as stones. This hierarchy is based on the degree of life each being possesses. In the human community there is also a hierarchy that takes into account the degree of life each person possesses. At the top level are the ancestors followed by the spirits of the departed. The living follow, with elders forming the most important category. Below elders are those who are married and are heads of families. The lowest category are babies. We can see here that the status one has in the society depends on vital rank.
LIFE
The third element of the African world view is the belief that life can increase, decrease and interact. The increase of life is achieved in various ways. The ordinary way is through growth from childhood until one reaches old age, the highest stage among the living. Another way is through ritual. This occurs in succession ceremonies and other rituals connected with acquiring powers to do certain tasks, such as being a medicine person or hunter.
The third way of increasing life is through being possessed by a higher being such as a spirit. One acquires by this some characteristics of such a higher being and can do extraordinary things such as walking on fire without being burnt. Finally, a being can increase life through eating and drinking, touching, and just being close to another person or the abode of the spirit of other things.
Just as there may be an increase of life, there can also be a decrease. Life can be decreased by such things as curses or being in contact with harmful things such as bad medicine. Thus sorcerers are detested because they are believed to destroy life through malice and use of bad medicines. Disrespect towards an elder can lead one to lose life through the anger of such an elder.
A word said by an elder is believed to be charged with power which can either enhance life through a blessing or destroy it through anger or a curse. This is why part of the respect the people give to elders is due to the belief that they have a power which can be beneficial if they are happy and destructive if they become angry. The increase and decrease of life is achieved by the interaction among creatures, including human beings.
Life can move from one being to another. There is no difference between material and immaterial, animate and inanimate beings. All beings have life that can be communicated. The higher beings such as spirits and humans can tap the life of lesser beings and use it to enhance their life or that of other human beings. This is what happens in the use of medicines.
The life inherent in certain trees and parts of animals is tapped and used to increase the life of human beings. The African people believe that an individual can communicate life to things and people he or she is in contact with. Furthermore, in the act of making something like the crafts, an individual communicates his or her life to his or her creation.
Therefore, according to the African people sorcery beliefs, a sorcerer can harm an individual through the person's property and everything that a person has made, such as a stool, a clay pot, basket, and so on. A sorcerer can take a piece of the property of the person he or she wants to injure and mix it with charms. In this way the sorcerer brings about the sickness or death of his or her victim.
ubupyani rite
Another example that points to the belief among the African people that an individual can communicate his or her life is the ubupyani rite among the Bemba of Zambia. This rite is done by one of the relatives of the deceased and with the surviving partner. At the appointed day they perform ritual sexual intercourse. The purpose of the rite is to bring back into the clan the umupashi, "spirit", of the deceased and to free the living partner from what the African people consider as the still-existing marriage bond.
There is a strong indication here that an individual communicates life to those with whom he or she is in very close physical contact. The same ubupyani rite also expresses the belief that an individual communicates life to material things he or she is in close contact with. Part of the ubupyani rite consists of the chosen successor taking part of the property of the deceased. The African people believe that the property of the deceased person contains, somehow, his or her life. Thus the successor does not only assume the social status of the deceased, but also shares in his or her life by using the very materials that were used by the deceased.
A final example relates to the belief among the African people that one can communicate one's good or bad condition. For example, among some African peoples it is believed that menstruating women, those who have had miscarriages, and people who have killed dangerous animals such as a lion or leopard are in a bad and dangerous situation. So they are not supposed to eat with others or touch the fire on which food is prepared for those people who are not in the same condition. They are also not allowed to be in physical contact with other people. If these polluted people broke this prohibition, then they would bring about sickness and even death to other people.
SYMBOLS
The fourth element in the African world view is the importance of symbols in the communication of life. All important stages of the person's life are marked by rites that involve the employment of symbols. Important stages of birth, puberty, marriage and even death are symbolically celebrated. These symbols are used because they are part of the unity of life I spoke about above. They are believed to have life although they are on the lower level of the hierarchy of life.
The employment of symbols follows three laws. First is the law of continuity. This law comes from the belief that whatever emanates from the person, such as a word, name, shadow, forms part of the person. For example, to pronounce a name is already to lay hands on the person. Furthermore all the things the person is in contact with, especially his possessions, are considered to be part of him or her and can be used to represent him or her.
The second law is that of similitude or simply that "like produces like." This means that analogy and correspondence are as good as identity, and by analogy and sympathy, the properties of a body of a given order are applicable to another order. For example, a lion is known to be a good hunter. So the human hunter uses part of the body of a lion to enhance his hunting ability. The third and final law is that of contrast. This means that a thing can work on its opposite. For example, the wound caused by a knife can be cured by the application of rust since rust signifies the death of the knife.
ANTHROPOCENTRICISM
The fifth and final element of the African world view is anthropocentrism. This means that the African people believe that at the centre of the world is the human community. Inferior forces (animal, plant, mineral), exist only the will of God, to increase the vital force of humans while they are on earth. Higher and lower forces therefore are thought of by the Bantu in relation to living human forces.
God and the other beings higher than human beings are believed to maintain the human community. The anthropocentrism of the African world view means that the maintenance of the human community is the main preoccupation of the people. Nearly all activities are geared to this. The prayers to God and the veneration of ancestors serve to maintain the human community. This human community is a corporate body in which community values are more stressed than personal ones. The individual finds fulfillment as a member of the community.
Such values as solidarity, togetherness and strong family ties connecting the living and the departed, are strongly stressed above an individual's values such as personal achievement. Personal fulfillment is seen in relation to that of the community. All this is because of the common sharing of life.
This brief presentation of the world view aimed at giving some elements of African culture that still influence the thinking, acting and emotional response of people even in the present African situation. These ideas form part of the underlying psychology or the deepest layer of culture. They help the people to respond to the challenges of the present moment where a lot of changes have been experienced on the two levels of culture of symbols and function.
Rev. Damian Musonda
St. Dominic's Major Seminary
Lusaka
IDENTITY CRISIS AND BREAKDOWN OF CULTURAL VALUES
What has triggered my reflections here is the question, To what extent would you agree that Africans are faced with an identity crisis and that this is one of the main factors underlying the breakdown of cultural values? This question is loaded and complex, and it begs several other questions. It implies that identity crisis causes the breakdown of cultural values.
My thesis is that it is the breakdown of cultural values that causes identity crisis, and not the other way round. What some Africans are faced with is a value crisis that leads to identity crisis. I have deliberately chosen to relate identity crisis to some Africans, and not to all Africans because different African people have different experiences as far as adherence to cultural values is concerned.
One of the great ironies of modern Africa, according to the well-known cultural historian, A.A. Mazrui, is that it took European colonialism to inform Africans that they were Africans. This identity was born out of European racism. What then is identity? And who specifies the identity of a person or a people?
Some authors say that human identity is formed by intense relations of self-exploration and in response to our relations, including our actual dialogues, with others. This means that our identity as Africans crucially depends on our dialogical relations with others. Identity has both personal and social dimensions. The social identity is derived from the society and is recognised a priori by the society since it is based on social categories everyone takes for granted. But personal identity does not enjoy recognition a priori and it has to win recognition through exchange.
In order to discuss the question of identity crisis, we need to take cognisance of the fact that people exercise respect for individuals by identifying them with particular socio-cultural, political, economic and geographical groups. This means that members of groups are publicly identified with the dominant characteristics, practices and values of their group. When then is a group of people said to be faced with identity crisis?
My own understanding of identity crisis is based on cultural values because it is cultural values that govern our practices and shape our characteristics. It follows that some Africans can be said to be faced with identity crisis if they are experiencing what I call a cultural value vacuum. This is when people do not have their own cultural values to govern their practices and to shape their characteristics.
Cultural values are a cohesive factor in building human societies. Upholding of cultural values within a group is the founding stone of society, manifesting themselves through language, history, religions, hopes and fears. There are several key African traditional cultural values. Here I will mention only two.
The first African traditional cultural value worth mentioning is commitment to strong communal bonds which manifests itself in various ways such as in solidarity and charity, in the inclusive concept of family, i.e., extended families, in hospitality and sharing.
The second African traditional cultural value is the centrality of life, the deep respect for life. This value manifests itself in birth and death rituals, ancestry, family and offspring, naming systems, inheritance customs, connectedness to land and environment (ecology), and in religious beliefs and practices.
At the advent of Islam and later of Western civilisation, the African traditional cultural values were brought into contact with foreign cultural values. The encounter of different cultural values brought about conflicts and tensions of cultures in dialectical interaction with each other. In The Africans: A Triple Heritage, Mazrui says that culture contact leads to culture conflict as two or more systems of values discover areas of incompatibility, areas of dissonance.
He also says that when cultures come in contact, it may happen that one of the cultures begins to gain ascendancy, and when this happens, the process of culture conquest has begun. This has occurred with the introduction into Africa of Islam and Western influences.
The infiltration of the Western culture mentioned above reached Africa primarily through colonialism. The culture conquest of the Western culture over the African cultures (African traditional cultural values) was to a certain extent by design. Mazrui argues that the colonial powers either engaged in a straightforward policy of linguistic, educational and cultural assimilation or else they adopted a selective and more subtle approach.
Western education became a powerful weapon of acculturation, moulding the minds of the Western-educated elite to desire particular aspects of European culture such as European clothes, food, laws, patterns of government and imported European goods. At a time of far-reaching social and political changes of the twentieth century, Western cultural values began to gain ascendancy over African cultural values. This made some Africans estrange themselves from their own traditional cultural values, and opt to fully embrace the foreign cultural values, without much, if any, critical analysis and reflection and understanding of the new cultural values. Analysing this all-pervasive influence of foreign values, Mazrui states:
''The authentic values of the past that had withstood the test of the time were being decried, ridiculed, and debased in the face of the new values imported by European civilisations. Hence, the new ambitions of the colonised subjects took the form of wanting to live like the colonialists, dress like them, eat and drink like them, speak and be housed like them, and laugh and get angry like them, in short to have the same religious, moral and cultural yardsticks.
One wonders if Africas experience as described above is an indication of transformation of cultural values or that of breakdown of cultural values. Before discussing this it is important to acknowledge that culture contact does have its own merits. It does provide a diverse set of cultural values. I agree with cultural nalysts who argue that a diverse set of cultural values enriches our opportunities and enables us to recognise the value of various cultures. This thereby teaches us to appreciate diversity not simply for its own sake but for its enhancement of the quality of life and learning.
I understand transformation of cultural values as a process that brings ones cultural values into dialectical interaction with other cultural values, resulting into informing, sharpening up and enriching own cultural values for the purposes of cultural, intellectual, human and spiritual growth and development.
On the other hand, the breakdown of cultural values is a process that brings ones cultural values into dialectical interaction with other cultural values, resulting into obliteration or destruction of the cohesive nature of ones cultural values to the extent of rendering them obsolete. This is like throwing away the baby with the bath water!
Both transformation and breakdown of cultural values involve a process of dialectical interaction of ones cultural values with other cultural values, but ending up with opposite results. On one hand, if this process results in informing and enriching ones cultural values, it means that transformation of cultural values has taken place. On the other hand, if this process result in inhibiting and destroying ones cultural values, it means that breakdown of cultural values has taken place.
Since the beginning of culture contact in Africa, we have experienced both cultural transformation and cultural breakdown. One of the few examples of cultural transformation in Africa is what I would like to call the bright side of individualism, one of the key cultural elements of Western culture. By adopting the positive aspects of individualism, we see that our cultural values have been enriched. For example, some Africans have a right to choose for themselves their own pattern of life, to decide in conscience what convictions to espouse, to determine the shape of their lives in a whole host of ways that their ancestors could not. From this we see that the positive aspects of individualism do bring about an opportunity to exercise the right to self-determination.
Another example of cultural transformation in Africa, which I am not going to elaborate here, is the practice of democracy in its various forms. In the context of Africa, this means a shift from monarchism tendencies and other practices in the traditional system of governance.
What are some of the examples of breakdown of cultural values in Africa? Here I am going to mention and explain only one example of breakdown of cultural values in Africa. In the recent years, the vast majority of African urban communities have shifted from embracing an inclusive concept of a family to embracing an exclusive one.
This is a negative aspect of individualism. One may say that some of the factors causing the break-up of the strong cultural bonds are poverty, the separation of work from home life, the, growth of a capitalistic, mobile and bureaucratic world. This does, to some extent, explain the growing numbers of the street children, and in some cases, street families in our cities. We see that people are moving away from the communal pattern of traditional African societies towards a new model of individualism, the nuclear family, private property and accumulation.
In the past, African people used to see themselves as part of a larger order. Although this was perceived as being restrictive, it did give meaning to the world and to the activities of social life. The things that surround us were not just potential raw materials or instruments for our projects, but they had the significance given to them by their place in the chain of being.
In the same token, the rituals and norms of society had more than merely instrumental significance. By getting rid of a larger order and settle for a smaller order of individuals, we have thrown away the baby with the bath water. Now some of the things have lost their magic. People have lost the broader vision because they are focussed on their own individual lives. One author has commented, Centering on the self both flattens and narrows our lives, and makes them poorer in meaning, and less concerned with others or society.
VALUE CRISIS AS IDENTITY CRISIS
When we critically look around the continent, we see that it is the breakdown of cultural values that causes identity crisis, whereas transformation of cultural values reinforces identities of individuals and groups. Once the cohesive nature of one's cultural values has been destroyed and the values have been rendered obsolete, one is faced with a value crisis, even if one attempts to borrow cultural values of other people. This is a situation of identity crisis because people can no longer claim to possess cul;tural values to govern their practices and to shape their characteristics.
Having understood breakdown of cultural values as the destruction of the cohesive nature of ones cultural values, and identity crisis as a cultural value vacuum. or as absence of cultural values, one can conclude from this that the latter is caused by the former. This means that identity crisis is caused by breakdown of cultural values. In the light of this, my position is that some Africans are faced with an identity crisis because their cultural values have broken down.
If we take, for instance, the negative aspects of individualism as elaborated above, we see that what has been destroyed is the sacred structure of the society on which social arrangements and modes of action were grounded. The natural world was closely linked with the supernatural world. Pleasing the supernatural beings (doing Gods will) and the happiness and well-being of the whole society, not just that of the individuals, were significant goal of human relationships and actions.
Because of the loss of this sacred nature of the society (the cohesive nature of the cultural values of communitarianism), it is common these days to see that, entrusted with authority, some Africans take into abusing their authority and public resources for personal aggrandisement and enrichment. Sadly, such leaders do not recognise or do not care about the effect of this practice on the rest of the community or society or nation.
Another example is with reference to the rising rate of crime. We see that some people go to the extent of killing others with impunity simply because of the desire to have acquired property. They care less about the emotional stress and other forms of suffering that this brings on the families of the deceased and the society at large as long as their happiness and well-being is safeguarded through these stolen valuables.
What explains this kind of behaviour is the absence in these people of cultural values to govern their practices and shape their characteristics. These malpractices by some Africans are symptomatic of identity crisis. They are faced with an identity crisis because their cultural values have broken down.
ROLE OF EDUCATION
Writing about North Americas and Europes cultural value influence on Africa, Mazrui says that the cultural value influence of these two is not merely in the field of capitalism and liberal democracy in their usual forms. It is also in the arena of life-styles and in the sciences, and the arts, in education, technology, dress culture, on the issue of food and drinks, fiction and art, music, film and television, high art and painting, and even in sexual morals.
Culture contact needs to be encouraged. However, this does not mean that people should dispossess themselves of their own cultural values in favour of a foreign set of cultural values, the cosmology of which they know nothing about or understand. The desirable product of culture contact should be transformation of ones cultural values. This is why it is unfortunate to note that some people on the continent are beginning to show a little appreciation for African history, religious ideas, clothes, cuisine, art, music and life-styles generally.
Identity crisis brings about a state of confusion. Some evidence of cultural confusion is rampant in some African communities as the same individuals are torn by contending forces making their psychological equilibrium no longer fully assured. An example of this is the people involved in the ritual killings and commerce-related serial killings that are rife in some African countries these days.
In the midst of some manifestations of identity crisis by some Africans as a result of breakdown of cultural values, some people are attempting to reach out for a cultural revival or a restoration of authenticity. Others, however, have completely submitted themselves to the new civilisation or engaged in cultural surrender.
ANY REMEDIES?
What remedies might be considered as cures for identity crisis facing some African people? Some African academics have come up with a number of suggestions. I think that the most powerful remedy to identity crisis lies in education. Africa needs to come up with an education system that trains its people to acquire knowledge, skills and aptitudes necessary both for preserving and defending the basic institutions and values of the society, as well as for adapting these to meet changing circumstances and new challenges.
I finish by repeating the statement from a conference convened by UNESCO in Addis Ababa in May 1961. I feel it still remains very relevant in Africa today. The conference attempted to provide bases for further debate and clarification of the role and pace of educational development in Africa.
Of interest to me in this statement, with which I have chosen to end my reflection, is the call for educational reform in Africa. African educational authorities should revise and reform the content of education in the areas of the curricula, textbooks, and methods, so as to take into account of the African environment, child development, cultural heritage, and the demands of technological progress and economic development, especially industrialisation.
This is a major challenge for any of us engaged in educational work of any form today in Africa.
Alex Muyebe, S.J.
Hekima College
Nairobi
SHOULD LOBOLA BE CHANGED?
According to the Constitution of the Republic of Zambia, once a person with a sound mind attains 21 years of age, he or she is regarded as an adult with full rights. For example, they can sue or to be sued, they have the right to own and dispose of property, and they have the right to engage in a contract freely.
However, in most African countries, the rights to adulthood for women are not a reality. In most African countries women are taken to be perpetually minors. From age zero to age 21 or until marriage, the girl child is under the guardianship of the parents, mainly the father. Even after 21 years of age, women are not free to contract marriage without the father's permission. Whenever an issue of marriage comes up, the woman will wait until the father and uncles determine the bride price (lobola). No consent is sought from the bride.
PRIDE PRICE
In the Eastern and Southern provinces of Zambia and some parts of Zimbabwe, bride price is paid in cattle form. During the bride price consultative meetings, women are not allowed to be present. Furthermore, after the meeting women have no right to ask as to what went on at the bride price meeting. In most Sub-Saharan African countries, bride price is the legal way to recognize the validity of the customary marriage. Simply put, without bride price marriage is not valid.
Originally lobola (pride price) was meant to be a token of appreciation. And by definition a token of appreciation is supposed to be determined by the giver and not the recipient. Furthermore a token of appreciation cannot be demanded but must be given at free will. But today the father-in-law and the uncles of the bride determine and demand the amount to be paid, either in cash or in material form.
Once paid, lobola is used to deprive a woman's right to freedom to dialogue with her husband. The man becomes the sole decision-maker in the house. Thus as one author has commented, "It stands to reason that a man who has paid dearly for his wife will expect very high returns from her. This clearly gives the right and power to be the judge of his wife's performance and productivity as well as reproductivity."
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS
In most sub-Saharan African constitutions, there are mainly three ways under which a person may get married, i.e., customary law, statutory law or Christian service (sometimes recognized under Statutory law). In statutory law, bride price is not a requirement to legalise the marriage. What are important are the legal age, consent, and love between the couple involved and a witness to their union. Marriage taken under statutory law is closed to polygamy.
The regulations governing Christian marriage are closely related to statutory marriage. Under Christian marriage, polygamy is out of question. Moreover, bride price is not a condition for marriage to take place. But in some dioceses, lobola is in fact tolerated as part of inculturation.
The destructive aspect of lobola, is that once paid " it is difficult to see how [the man] can avoid, to a greater or lesser extent, regarding the woman as his property, or the woman regarding herself as a possession. According to the law, customary marriage is potentially polygamous. That is to say, under customary law the man is free to marry more than one woman. Furthermore, in customary marriage the full payment of the bride price is an indispensable act of validating the marriage.
During my own pastoral experience in Chikuni parish in the Southern Province, I have found out that most youths and young married women talk very highly of gender equality and of the right to be treated as an adult after the age of 21, before and during marriage. Also most youths and young couples detest polygamous marriage. And yet these same young people would never want to be married simply under statutory or Christian marriage laws!
Here is the paradox. Most women in Sub-Saharan Africa prefer to be married under customary law but they do not want to live in a polygamous marriage. But if they do not want to give their spouses the chance to enter into a polygamous marriage, then why do the women not go for a full statutory and/or Christian marriage?
In response to this question many women will say that lobola is something that shows their worth and their value to the their husbands. We might make a comparison by stating that slaves who fetched a high price when bought by slave owners might have felt superior to those whose worth only received a smaller sum in the negotiated bargain.
And some of the more articulate women those who probably received a large lobola are the ones whose voices are heard most clearly in debating this point. Therefore it seems to me that it is contradictory for women to claim legal rights to adulthood and to gender equality while at the same time taking pride in the bride price.
The truth is that " lobola custom has lost much of its traditional and spiritual significance, and has, as most people are aware, become highly commercialized, but is the buttress of the whole present systems of marriage, and pervades every area of personal law.
For this reason, as long as lobola is recognized both by the Church and the state, the liberation of women, gender equality and women's pledge to be treated as adults will only continue to be a dream but never something fully to be realized. By accepting to be married under customary law, women have deprived themselves of the rights to adulthood. Thus women have put themselves in the state of not only being perpetual minors but also the property for men.
Before marriage, the girl child is under the guardianship of the parents and the father makes choices for her. After marriage the girl child, now the married woman, is under the guardianship of the husband. Consequently the husband now makes all decisions and choices for her. From this, one sees that under customary law the woman is a minor through and through.
Yet does not this situation contradict Paragraph three of the Preamble of the Constitution of Zambia (Amendment Act 1996) which states clearly that we the people of Zambia "recognize the equal worth of men and women in their rights to participate, and freely determine and build a political, economic and social system of their own free choice." In my view, this statement is simply not applicable to women who marry under customary law.
CONSEQUENCES OF LOBOLA
There is a further point that we should consider. Lobola is the root cause of the terrible practice of property grabbing as it is currently practiced among many groups in Zambia (and elsewhere in Africa). In the sense that lobola is not meant to be paid by the bridegroom alone, it is clearly a family project. Each member of the bridegrooms family contributes something towards their relative's bride price. Once the man's family finishes the payment, the couple can now go ahead with marriage.
But now when the husband dies, the husband's family feels the pinch of having lost money as well as their relative. Thus, as a way to compensate themselves for this loss, they resort to property grabbing, carrying away the assets still in the hands of the widow. Property grabbing is taken as a way of bringing back part of what was lost during the payment of the bride price.
WAY FORWARD
Having all these facts in front of us, what is the way forward? I suggest that the Church and the state take serious measures to eradicate or at least change the format of bride price. In order to avoid continuation of the problems I have outlined above, problems before and after marriage and following the death of the husband, bride price as it is practiced today should be changed into a better form.
For example, instead of the son-in-law paying the lobola to the father-in-law, the bride and bridegroom's families should contribute something directly to the newly married couple. This would significantly help them have a good start in their married life together.
Does it not make better sense today, both for traditional and for Christian reasons that marriage should be based on three major conditions: legal age, unconditional love between the woman and the man, and mutual consent between the couple? Once I was reading a Bahai book and I came across a beautiful image of marriage. According to Bahai faith, marriage is like a bird with two wings. The bird flies using the two wings.
The flapping of wings balances the bird in the air. Both wings are of equal importance to each other and they both drive and sustain the bird in the air. The wings must work together for the bird to fly. Now it is in this way that I think that husband and wife are like wings driving and sustaining marriage. The man and woman in marriage should work side by side in order to sustain each other in a marriage relationship that is loving, fruitful and lasting.
Zampi Phiri, S.J.
Chikuni Parish
Chisekesi
I am indebted for some insights to Joan May, Changing People, Changing Laws (Gweru: Mambo Press, 1987)]
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR?
We invite readers to send us your reactions to any of the JCTR Bulletin articles this promotes some very interesting and worthwhile exchanges.
Table of Contents | Next Article
Home | Information | Activities | Updates | Networking | Cost of Living | Publications | Jubilee Zambia